Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dark Shadows (2011 film)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Dark Shadows. — Coffee // have a cup // essay // 04:10, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dark Shadows (2011 film)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per WP:NFF, films that have not been confirmed by reliable sources to have commenced principal photography should not have their own articles. This film has not yet begun principal photography, and, as of today (2 March 2011), no casting has been confirmed. The involvement of Pfeiffer and Bonham Carter are only rumors. (See this link that is cited as a reference in the article to confirm the rumor status of any casting.) WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 18:11, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Many big names have started projects of all sizes that have failed to materialize, which is why the standard of 'commencing principal photography' is sound and reasonable. Deletion with no prejudice to recreation once the standards are met. - CobaltBlueTony™ _talk 19:49, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:17, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Dammit! I was looking out for this by having Dark Shadows (film) on my watchlist! Anyway, per the notability guidelines for future films, I support a merge to Dark Shadows#Upcoming film. The project has been in development for years, so if it begins filming, it can get its own article for all eternity. In the meantime, I recommend merging the content to the TV series article and merging this article's page history to Dark Shadows (film), if that is appropriate to do. Erik (talk | contribs) 23:24, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Agree with Eric and support the merge/redirect. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 06:30, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I agree that at first the page was full of rumors but it has improved now that I've deleted that rubbish but I also agree that maybe the page should be merged with the TV series page.--Barnabasmcavoy (talk) 14:39, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.